“The future of biomed … Are you ready?”

November 15th, 2009 by admin 1 comment »

In my 25 years as a biomedical engineer, the medical world has changed right before my eyes. While my education and training was specific to how to work on mechanical and hydraulic devices within a hospital setting, today, understanding of electrical devices is increasingly important – and essential – in the biomedical profession. Biomeds must not only know how to inspect, repair, calibrate and maintain biomedical devices quickly and efficiently, but we must also understand and be able train other medical staff on the theory of the equipment’s operation, safe clinical application and its interaction with patients.

Medical electronic equipment covers such a wide span of equipment types and environments that it is not realistic to apply a single set of requirements across the board, which is why formal electronics education is not a requirement of all biomedical engineering jobs.  But whether you’re new to the field or a seasoned veteran, today’s working biomeds should recognize that succeeding in the profession means not only having a biomedical engineering education, but also a vast knowledge of electronic circuits and understanding of IT.  Almost daily we are asked (and expected) to be able to inspect, repair, train and understand a wide range of devices from OR carts to computers and IV pumps, etc.

As biomeds, it is our responsibility to look ahead and be prepared for the changes that are occurring within our profession. We must be ready and willing to expand upon what knowledge we have already worked so hard to achieve.

Piedmont Fayette Hospital

Biomed Dept.

Phil Brown

“RFID: Do we wait?”

November 15th, 2009 by admin 4 comments »

RFID or Radio Frequency Identification is a relatively new technology that is now being implemented in the hospital management setting. Initially (and most often) used in the retail market, it is a tool increasingly used for identifying and tracking items or people by placing a small memory-storage chip (tag) on the item. RFID readers (or emitters) send out radio frequency waves (3 Hz to 300 GHz) to detect tags and read data. Data pertaining to the item or the person is stored for continuous retrieval through the reader. Some of the most common uses of RFID in healthcare include:

1)    Inventory tracking in the hospital, manufacturing and other healthcare domains

2)    Pharmaceutical supply management for pharmacies or pharmaceutical distributors

3)    Employee identification in worksites

4)    Patient tracking in case of clinical trials and other medical reasons[1]

While RFID systems are being used in the healthcare sector, there have been restrictions on its use due to its interference with other critical electrical equipment used in the hospital (pacemakers, ICD’s and other critical electronic medical devices). Preliminary FDA testing has shown that some RFID emitters could potentially slow the rate of pacemakers or cause implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD’s) to deliver inappropriate shocks. Other electronic medical devices could also react inappropriately in the presence of RFID.

FDA, in collaboration with AAMI Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices EMC Task Group, conducted laboratory tests of pacemaker and ICD reactions to RFID. The devices were exposed to emissions from RFID readers at 3 different frequencies and at various distances from the devices. Preliminary findings showed inappropriate reactions in some of the devices. Reactions included inhibited pacing and inappropriate delivery of ICD therapy. Studies are being continuously conducted on the effects of RFID in the healthcare sector.[2]

All medical devices containing electronic components are prone to electromagnetic interference. The FDA requires that all electronic products undergo electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing before being marketed. These, however, get damaged or react inappropriately in the presence of larger magnitudes or proximity of electromagnetic waves.

Anyone making a decision on implementing a RFID system should wait until more regulations are set forth by the FDA and FCC. However, if the need arises to implement one, make sure additional precautions are taken including an onsite EMI testing[3]. Furthermore, addition of electronic life-supporting medical devices should be tested to be safe in an RFID environment.

By, Jerin George Mathew


[1] http://www.ups-scs.com/solutions/white_papers/wp_RFID_in_healthcare.pdf

[2] http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/ElectromagneticCompatibilityEMC/ucm116647.htm

[3] http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/print/4166

Welcome to Biomed Huddle!

October 27th, 2009 by katie.irvine 3 comments »

Welcome to Biomed Huddle! My name is Katie Irvine and I am the moderator for this blog. To get things started, I feel like I should tell you a little bit about myself. I have worked in this field for the past two years and I am currently seven months (and counting!) away from getting my MBA. I am NOT a blogger but I have done my fair share of facebooking, and I appreciate the benefits that an online social network can offer. I certainly do not claim to be an expert in this field, you are the experts and I am here to learn from you. On that note, it is my goal to have the content for this site come from the members. From time to time I might post a blog about a topic that I’m interested or some interesting industry news (or non-industry news) and I might ask a few of my engineer friends to write about their areas of expertise. I won’t ever claim to have extensive knowledge but I encourage all of you to write about your own extensive knowledge and share your expertise with this community. I also want this site to be fun and I will do my best to come up with as many contests, prizes, events, and exciting content as possible. Thanks for taking the time to join our site! Have fun!